NEWS
EVENTS
A Dangerous use of the Dangerous Dogs Act
Tuesday 26th June 2018 | Jake
Everybody is familiar with the headlines, ‘vicious Pitbulls fighting gangs’, ‘Staff chews owners face off’. Some dogs have a bad reputation, and the media, particularly tabloids, have long called for a ban or legislation restricting their availability.
As with most sensationalist media crusades, fact and fiction are interchangeable and largely irrelevant, and the overwhelming support these breeds enjoy from the people who actually own them will do little to change the obtuse minds of those calling for a ban. Generally those who wish to ban dogs have little time for them in any case, irrespective of their perceived nature, they generally aren’t fans of dogs, or are at least short-fused when it comes to them.
PETA, the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, is commonly understood to be a lover of all animals. However, they have recently asked for the breeding of Staffordshire Bull Terriers to be banned. Amid public dismay at the organisation’s stance, PETA released a statement, saying “the legislation is breed-specific protection. When properly enforced, it prevents pit bull–type dogs from being born only to suffer.”
Of course the vast majority of people don’t want any dog to suffer, and would support legislation that truly protects them from harm. But a blanket ban on breeding won’t do this. Banning an endearing dog, adored by the vast majority of its owners as a loyal, loving animal, because negligent humans have abused them and used them for wrong only serves to punish the innocent parties. Adding another breed to the Dangerous Dogs Act doesn’t solve the problem, it just delays finding the answers.
To sign the petition asking government to reject PETA’s proposal, click here.
